Search for: "Steven Garnett" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2017, 1:07 pm by Calvin TerBeek
Garnett and Sachs question whether it is problematic for originalism to have been "born in sin. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) I’ve contributed to two online symposiua discussing Justice Stevens’ retirement and his potential successor. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:30 pm
  Contributors include Larry Alexander, Robert Audi, Anthony Bellia, John Finnis, Rick Garnett, Frederick Gedicks, Paul Horwitz, Andrew Koppelman, Robert Rodes, Steven D. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 1:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
” with regard to the Stevens replacement, and published the answers here. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:32 pm by Paul Horwitz
Our friend and colleague Rick Garnett has a post at the National Review's Bench Memos website offering advice for upcoming discussions of the Stevens opening on the Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 6:34 am by Lawrence Solum
Pacifica Foundation (And Its Second Life) (FIRST AMENDMENT STORIES, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, eds., Foundation Press, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
15 May 2010, 4:46 am by Lawrence Solum
Garnett, Notre Dame Law School Smith's book is insightful, provocative, and wonderfully engaging. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:23 am by Trey Childress
  Among others, leading scholars such as Abdullahi Ahmen An-Nai'Im, Andrew Koppelman, Michael Stokes Paulsen, Ayelet Shachar, Steven Smith, Suzzane Stone, and this blog's own Rick Garnett and Paul Horwitz will be presenting. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Galloway, (Northwestern University Law Review Online Vol. 108, p. 218, 2014).Steven Douglas Smith, Is God Irrelevant? [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by anna su
First, according to Rick Garnett, it is largely a religious-secular divide. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Eric Freedman, Richard Garnett, Seth Kreimer, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein, arguing that the court should hear the case.) [read post]